The episode opens with some one-on-one
basketball. They toss some rocks and talk some trash, then one is
shot by a sniper! The second guy only has a moment to be puzzled be
fore he, too, is felled by a bullet!
A bloody bouncing basketball
transitions to a normal basketball in a gym somewhere, where Muscles
and Brown Eyes are having a roundball duel of their own! Matt wins,
but Eric's good about it! At the office some amount of time later -
maybe they were playing before work - the team gets word about the
sniper in Illinois!
They start talking about Tim Omundsen
back in season 1 - could this sniper be a copycat? Um... no? Like,
there have been a couple of snipers since then. Luke Cage, the kid
from Suspect Behaviour - since this guy isn't trying to wound people,
there's no reason to bring up the sniper from season 1. Of course,
this is taking place in the same city as his rampage, so there could
be a connection.
The team rushes to the plane, then we
cut back to Des Plaines, where I guess word hasn't gotten out about
the sniping, because three more people get shot while hanging out in
a park! Maybe it's time to shut down the whole city, like they did
with DC back in 2002. Or was it 2003?
My question - why are people so
comfortable hanging around in public places when they know there's a
sniper on the loose? Snipers are pretty famously one of the most
alarming types of killers there are for the public. If the first
victim in the parking lot two days earlier had been shot in a
drive-by, or the cops were simply treating it as a standard murder,
that would be one thing - but this is someone killed with a rifle
from far away, and nobody heard a shot, suggesting a silencer of some
kind was being used. That's the kind of crime that makes everyone
ultra-careful until they know that it's been resolved in some
meaningful way.
This is something that the show forgets
every time - but when compared to real life, the absurdity becomes
obvious. Try to imagine a situation where someone is sniping people
in a city and the cops do literally anything else but chase that
person until they're caught? It basically has never happened.
Especially in a city that's already been through this exact thing.
Imagine how fast DC would be put on lockdown if another sniper showed
up.
So, will Des Plaines be shut down when
the team gets there? Let's find out after the credits?
On the plane, they keep talking as if
this killer is mimicking the work of Tim, even though the only thing
they have in common is that they're shooting people in public places
in the same city. Still, focusing on Tim is the only lead they've
got!
Garcia reveals that two of the three
latest victims survived their shooting! So that's something! Oh, and
the park the latest victim was shot in was named after that SWAT
captain that the team goaded Tim into shooting. So that's a really
solid connection, actually!
Okay, the show just went off the rails
when they go to meet Anthony Denison in the park. They talk about how
cops are going to be the next target - since this killer has now shot
as many people as Tim did before killing a cop, and JJ tries to
rewrite history, announcing that Tim attacked the investigation
because cops were getting too close.
Except no, that's not what happened.
You decided that the SWAT captain was the killer, and you tried to
arrest him, and Tim shot him because you were trying to steal credit
for his work. It was - entirely - your fault that he died.
While assessing the scene, no one asks
the big question - where was the guy shooting from? There's trees
everywhere, and no buildings towering over the park. Was the guy just
fifty feet away in the bushes? If so, shouldn't finding his sniper's
nest be your top priority right now? Ballistics will let you know
which direction the shots were coming from, after all.
Matt and Eric talk to the woman who
called the cops, and she mentions that she didn't hear any gunshots.
Then they finally look over the body placement, and claim something
strange - that the killer couldn't have fired from a parking lot,
since there were obstacles in the way!
But no, there weren't. As we learned
from Jack Reacher, a guy could have stopped his van, fired three
shots out the window, and driven away. There's plenty of clean
sightlines based on the images we see. Nice try, though!
Anyhoo, they use their complete lack of
understanding of how shooting works to offer a bold new theory -
maybe the killer wasn't firing from a long distance at all! Wait,
what? You think someone got close up with a rifle and no one noticed
them? Or were they not shot with rifle bullets? If not, that's
information we really, really, really need to have.
Oh, and we see a guy standing in the
woods, watching the investigation, wearing a motorcycle helmet. Is he
the killer? That would be incredibly dumb, since there must be fifty
cops around controlling access to the area. He'd never be able to get
away.
At the ME's office we get the news -
the three new victims were shot with 9MM pistol rounds! Then the
ballistics reports come in - two different guns were used in the
park, and both had silencers! Fun fact - a ballistics report couldn't
tell you that a silencer was used with any kind of accuracy. It could
tell you that different guns were used, and there's a decent chance
you could match it to a specific gun, but silencers don't leave lots
of telltale marks on bullets.
Also, was the parking lot guy shot with
a pistol as well, or was he actually hit with a rifle? I feel like
they would have known about it by now if he was shot with a pistol.
The team interviews family members and
witnesses of the crimes, but get no leads! They puzzle over why this
'copycat' is killing so much faster than Tim did. Now that we've
found out that it's multiple people using pistols, is it really
useful to be thinking of these guys as copycats at all?
They get a tip that the killers were
seen leaving the park in a grey sedan - just like Tim did! Could this
be a plan to lure cops into an ambush? The team mentions that the
accelerated timeline could be designed to make cops vulnerable to
attack, but that doesn't actually make any sense. If they wanted to
kill cops, it's never hard to find or ambush one. Shooting five
people in three hours will only serve to put the cops on high alert.
But maybe that's what the killers want? A challenge worthy of them?
And this is actually a copycat of the cop-hunter from season 4?
As the team sets up a convoy to go to
the place where the sedan was last seen - an apartment building close
to Tim's old residence - we cut over to a bunch of bikers prepping
something in a garage nearby! They've got a van and multiple bikes
ready to move - are they going to attack the convoy? That would be a
deeply stupid idea, so maybe!
Yup! They throw a flash grenade into an
FBI SUV and kidnap Matt and Eric, leaving Aisha behind! The team gets
there a minute later, but the bikers are gone! So... wait... do these
bikers have a specific problem with team members from the BAU, and
they 'copycatted' a crime of theirs to lure them to the city? That's
an insane plan.
In the ambulance Aisha wants to be
hypnotized so that she can remember details about who attacked them!
I don't know how much help she'll be, since everyone was wearing
masks, but who knows? Maybe they talked loudly while she was
half-conscious?
At the abduction site the team wonders
why the MO has switched so drastically. They realize that the team
must have been the real targets all along! Twist! Luckily Aisha's
hypnotism has worked, and she's able to remember the killer's hand
tattoo! Like an idiot, he wasn't wearing motorcycle gloves! Of
course, if he had been, the tattoo would have just been on his
forearm, so that's not a big problem, really.
Garcia runs down the tattoo and goes
over Matt and Eric's bios - they were the targets, so they must have
something in common! Could it be from before they were on the BAU?
Wait... what would the bikers have done if they weren't both in the
same SUV? That's quite a bit of luck!
Then it's back over to the bikers, who
are apparently planning on delivering the guys to someone? They were
hired to do this? By whom? The head of the bikers does have a history
with the two of them, however - and he's annoyed that they don't
recognize him! So he beats them up a little, because, again, he's a
bad guy.
The whole scene is kind of confusing,
because they're talking about 'burning the pigs' and 'making a drop',
but it's not clear if the two are related. It would be weird if they
weren't, but you never know with a show like this!
Garcia identifies the killer right
away! He was a mob hitman that fled to Europe, where Matt chased him
down, and then Eric caught him at his brother's house! Which led to
the brother being sent to jail for ten years for letting the killer
stay with him! That's not enough of a motive for the team, however -
getting revenge on two cops can't be what this whole thing is about,
so they keep digging for things that the killer could be up to
specifically in Des Plaines.
This is one of those weird situations
where the characters seem to have read the script. Any other person
on earth would look at the facts - a twist psychopath lured the two
FBI agents who were responsible for his arrest to a town, then
grabbed them - and think 'yup, that must be what's going on here!'
It's only these characters who would look at this absolutely
preposterous situation and think 'no, there must be another level of
madness to it!
There's a more natural way to get to a
lead - just looking for any resources or connections the killer has
to the city is a totally believable thing for them to be doing
without the extra 'we know there must be something bigger at work
here' nonsense. Because out all of the other times the team was
targeted, only once was something bigger going on. And that was a
prison break. A prison break that only failed because they targeted
the team.
Yes, I remember the time Mr. Scratch 'used them' to get a list of people with MPD, but zero parts of that story made sense, so I'm not counting it.
At the warehouse, the killer makes a
strong argument that it's just a personal thing, since his brother
was murdered by a rival gang when they were put in prison! He blames
the two men for getting his brother put in the same maximum security
lockup where murderers who hated him were located! Which is a pretty
good point, actually, since all the brother did was let his
on-the-lam brother stay with him for a little while.
He also mentions that the gang cut up
his face to remind him of his dead brother, but the makeup artists
didn't do much with his face, so that doesn't really land.
Hey, how did Penelope not immediately
know the brother was dead? I know it's because they wanted the reveal
to be in this scene, but then end the last scene with her looking at
the file and being shocked by what she finds, then cutting away
before the reveal. But no, they have her find out what happened in
the next scene, because she's apparently terrible at her job.
We get some nonsense psychology as the team finds out about the brother's death - apparently his tongue was cut out, so maybe he was talking to the screws inside the prison? The team decides that it's a classic case of transference, and the killer is taking out his anger on Matt and Eric because he can't get back at the people who killed him! This seems like a stretch - as if the show is saying it's unreasonable that he would be angry at the cops who put his brother in jail where he got killed, and he needs extra motivation to hate them. He really doesn't, though.
Matt and Eric try to drive a wedge
between the killer and his gang by claiming that the brother was
turning state's evidence against him and his lieutenant had the
brother killed - which is why the killer was only injured! The killer
finds this compelling because they know the lieutenant's name:
"Flea". Of course, all the bikers have been talking loudly
in the next room, so why would that be strange information for them
to have?
Still, it's convincing enough to get
the killer to shoot Flea! Which suggests the plan to sow dissent in
the ranks might not be as successful as they'd hoped!
Garcia identifies the tattoo as
belonging to an outlaw biker gang and Joe calls his biker task force
contact to see if they know anything that's going on in the area!
Presumably they'll get onto the big deal, which raises an important
question - why did the bikers think that having the whole town on
high alert because a sniper was on the loose would somehow make it
easier for them to make some kind of illicit deal? Wouldn't the cops
be suspicious of anyone driving around the city when there's a mass
murderer on the loose?
Joe and Emily go to talk to an
undercover FBI agent at a local biker bar, and he tells them that the
killer's gang is using an abandoned warehouse as a base of
operations! Garcia quickly uses CCTV footage to find one that bikes
have been going into and out of recently! Wait, couldn't she have
been tracking bikers literally the moment they knew it was bikers,
six hours ago? Anyhoo, that was easy!
Also, it was kind of unnecessary, since
Matt was able to pick his handcuffs with a piece of wood, or maybe a
small nail, setting him and Eric free to kill all the bikers! Well,
except for one, who gets the drop on Matt at the end and Joe shoots
him just in time!
THE END
Except for a scene on the plane, where
Eric and Matt talk about how the trick about killing Flea gave them
the edge they needed! Also the brother wasn't actually talking to the
cops, that was just a lie Matt told.
It's a nice attempt to make their
psychology skills seem relevant to the case, but did they need to
escape? The team was right outside the building, and if Flea was
still alive, it wouldn't have affected the timeline in any meaningful
way. Still, you've got to pretend, right?
1 - Was profiling in any way helpful in
solving the crime?
Nope!
2 - Could the crime have been solved
just as easily using conventional police methods given the known
facts of the case?
They found a guy who disliked both Matt
and Eric, and he was the killer. Database management solved the case
this week.
So, on a scale of 1 (Dirty Harry) to 10
(Tony Hill), How Useful Was Profiling in Solving the Crime?
1/10 - Hey, if the bikers just drove
the van back to the warehouse, why weren't they able to track that on
CCTV? Later on Garcia finds the warehouse in question because there's
footage of bikes driving in and out of it - information that takes
her five seconds and ten keystrokes to get, BTW - so why not do the
same thing for the black van which was driving around on basically
empty streets?
Weird how the planned drop never wound
up amounting to anything, isn't it?
This wasn't a good episode.
No comments:
Post a Comment