In bed, a woman is awoken by her
smartwatch! It warns her that the motion sensors outside the house
are detecting someone. Her husband assures her that it's just the
cat, and they should go back to sleep. Why even have an alarm system?
Then they hear someone banging on the door downstairs and screaming! So naturally they check the door camera and call the security office, who are already sending a car!
The couple debates whether to open the
door, and decide not to - but it woudn't have mattered, because the
killer comes and grabs the guy less then 30 seconds after they turned
on the camera. So by the time they got downstairs and opened the
door, he would have been there, killing them. I'm not saying that
this guy is an idiot, but if you're ever in this position, running
away from a killer in a suburban neighbourhood, here's what you do -
run across lawns, screaming for the police, and every time to pass a
house, smash every window you can without slowing down. A dozen
families waking up at once is the kind of thing that gets the police
super-mobilized, and might even scare off a killer.
At Quantico, the team is talking about
the fact that DRGF is planning a housewarming party so that she can
meet the whole team. Eric is hesitant about it for no good reason!
Time for the case! It seems that a week
ago a couple was wound with duct tape and killed in their home. Last
night a man with duct tape on was banging on a door, screaming about
how someone was going to kill 'us'. That suggests another couple has
been attacked! Although the victim hasn't been identified yet.
Despite Garcia's access to Portland's DMV, and the fact that they
have a high-resolution image of the man's face from the door camera.
Garcia explains that 'nothing's come up' on the guy. So what, he
doesn't have a driver's license?
Then it's over to the killer's lair,
where the couple are tied down with nowhere near enough duct tape.
Seriously, there's just a single piece over the guy's forehead and
neck, he could easily sit up with no trouble at all. They talk about
how scared they are, and then the killer arrives with a blow torch
and night vision goggles, even though it's super-bright in the room!
Apparently the killer's thing is to burn people's eyes out with
blowtorches? Disgusting!
On the plane, they get more details
about the first victims! The tips of their corneas were burned, and
no other part of them. Then they were stabbed to death! Ick. On the
video, they spot a similiar burn on one of the victim's eyes!
At the police station, the team notes
that the suburban neighbourhood borders a bit of forest. Could the
victim have run all the way through it? Probably not - if he did, how
could the killer have tracked him in the vehicle he used to take the
guy away? He'd have to have known where the guy came out of the
woods, which would be impossible to predict. This seems fairly
implausible already.
Also, despite the fact that they only
have two data points - the dead family, and the guy who banged on the
door - there's three spots marked on the city map. Speaking of, I
just checked the map, and while the bound guy would have had to have
run anywhere from 500 meters to 1km based on where he was being held
- we can assume that he was being held somewhere bordering on the
woods, because he ran straight through them instead of looking for
help closer - the killer would have had to have drive somewhere
between 2.5 and 3 miles to reach the same location in a vehicle.
This means that it would have taken the
killer and his victim roughly the same amount of time to get to the
place they ended up - the problem is, the victim had to get to
literally any house, while the killer had no idea where his victim
would come out of the woods. For all he knew, the victim could have
waited in the woods until he sped away, then doubled back and called
the police from a closer building.
The only way any of this was possible
at all is if the killer has a partner, who followed the victim on
foot while the killer used GPS to track their movements. Which isn't
all that likely.
Eric thinks it's significant that had the victim just turned right after leaving the woods he would have stumbled onto a community police station. They assume that means that these victims might not be from Portland. Except, you know, people only know about the community policing stations in their own neighbourhood. In my town there are dozens of community policing stations. But I can only tell you about two places to find cops - the station just down the street from me, and the headquarters downtown. I can't imagine that it's different for people in Portland, a city only slightly smaller than the one I live in.
JJ heads off to the murder house, and
they transition to that location by doing the 'zoom in on a picture'
that was the show's trademark visual for the first season and was
largely abandoned after! Nice callback, episode!
The first victims' son walks JJ through
the house, trying to find any clues. She gets a juicy one - the
killer turned off all of the power to the house, making it was pitch
black when he killed his victims. No light, blinding victims - it
seems like someone's a little focused on taking away sight, isn't it?
JJ goes to talk to Reid and Matt, and her first statement questions
whether the son might be the killer. Why? Because he didn't tell the
cops about the power being out! But then he told you right away,
silly. Why would the killer have done that?
They find fingerprints all over the
floor - the killer must have blinded the couple, then let them move
around the room, sightless, so he could enjoy watching them suffer
until they died! They have a new assumption - the killer must have
let the victim go last night with one good eye, just so he could hunt
him down again! Gosh, that killer is a moron, because there's no way
he would have been able to catch the guy. Again, unless there were
two of them.
More with the victims, who are still
tied up, reminisce about their lives together! The guy is blinded,
the woman has not been.
The killer comes back and unties the
man, giving him a chance to run! But how far will he make it with no
ability to see?
At the police station, the team asks
the important question - why would the killer turn all the lights off
in the house if he was going to blind the people anyway? What's the
point of night vision goggles when you're chasing blind people
around? You could just turn the lights on. They have no idea, of
course, and wonder if it has a symbolic meaning, rather than an
obvious on, like, for example, maybe the killer has something wrong
with his eyes?
Garcia finds video footage of the guy
running, and he's moving incredibly fast with great form! Could he be
a runner in town for a marathon? They check the registrants of that
weekend's race, and find the guy immediately!
We see that the guy ran past three
houses, which is a little weird - like I said, if you're ever in this
situation, break windows. Also maybe go to back yards? You'll be
harder to catch if the guy can't see you from the street.
Oh, and the couple was staying at an
AirBNB - which Matt points out is a great way to get targeted by a
serial killer!
We intercut the couple trying to escape
with the team rushing towards the rental house. Will they be inside,
or will this be yet another riff on that scene from Silence of the
Lambs? The guy offers to untie his wife, but she says that the killer
will be back soon, and there's no time. Her plan? Guide him out by
describing where the stairs out of the room are!
Great plan, lady. Except, when you get
to the bottom of the stairs, he's still going to be blind, and you
won't be able to guide him any more. So... maybe just let him untie
you? It's not going to be hard, duct tape is very fragile.
And yes, it's yet another Silence of
the Lambs thing, and the guy gets stabbed as soon as he gets to the
front door. Seriously, what was going on with this plan? If you'd set
your wife free, the two of you could have laid a trap for this guy.
Are you people morons who hate being alive? Couldn't the production
staff have just chained her up to explain why he wouldn't be able to
save her?
They find no clues at the house, but
Eric gets some info from a neighbour kid! Proving that the show is
garbage at keeping a timeline, Eric asks about anything strange
happening 'last night', and the kid tells him about the abduction.
But, of course, the abduction was two night ago. How is the show so
bad at this?
Anyway, the kid next door saw the
killer wearing strange sunglasses at night. What could they have
been? Eric shows him a picture of some, and the kid immediately
identifies them as the kind of glasses that help nearly-blind people
see! Time for the profile! They think it's a blind guy who hates
sighted people, and wants to get revenge on them for being able to
see! Great insight, there. Maybe focus on illegally searching medical
records?
Up in the attic, the lady finds out
that her husband has been killed, and freaks out. Then she asks the
guy what happened to his eyes, and he whispers the story to her!
Garcia digs up that the first dead
couple included a doctor who did exposure therapy - forcing children
to confront their phobias in order to overcome them. One of his
patients jumped off a bridge, and he shut down the program. JJ
believes that the son withheld the detail about the power being off
in the house because he subconsciously knew that these murders had to
do with a shameful secret in his family's past!
Except no, obviously he didn't, that's
just a crazy thing to say. Also, he did report the thing about the
breakers. He reported it to you. Don't you think it's way more likely
that when he was first in shock after finding his parents' bodies he
didn't remember every detail, but a week later, talking to you, he
knew more? Isn't that the more logical answer?
The son shows Reid and Emily where his
dad kept the files from his research, and two super-dumb things
happen right on top of one another. First, Reid observes that the
files have been anonymized, so there's no names attached to them. He
says this before opening the boxes, so how would he know? And why
would the doctor do this with his own personal records?
Even dumber, JJ opens her first box and
the first file she pulls out is a kid who was scared of the dark - it
must be the killer! That's right - there were two closets stacked
full of boxes, and literally the first file from the first box is the
guy they're looking for. Ugh.
In the killer's lair, he lets the lady
go with just her hands tied. She offers to help him, if she can, and
he sends her off!
Every now and then I get to a scene in
Criminal Minds where I just wind up staring blankly at the screen,
straining to understand what's happening. This is such a moment. They
need to find the identity of one of the anonymized patients, #20411.
Reid thinks that the number is a code that can be cracked. Why would
it be, though? Isn't the whole point of anonymizing files to give
them arbitrary numbers that you just look up in a ledge somewhere?
This leads to Reid winning a Prentiss
Award for the next scene-
That's right, Reid has had them print
up a hundred number cards so he can lay out all of the possible
arrangements of those five numbers. Why? How much information can you
plausibly hide in five numbers? This is insane, and if it somehow
works, I'm going to be furious.
Also, and I can't stress this enough,
since they know what year the study was done, and the file would say
what age the kid was, and they know what city he lives in, shouldn't
they just check male children of that who are blind now? How long
could that possibly take? It's not like he's not seeing a doctor for
his condition - he has special glasses.
Hey, remember when, earlier in the
episode, they tried to figure out why the killer target the jogging
couple, and wondered if it was about the house they were staying in?
I guess they never looked into the history of the house, and then
forgot about that line of inquiry, because in this scene JJ brings
that concept up like it's a new idea!
Serious question: Is anyone reading
these scripts before they're shot?
The team talks to the person who runs
the AirBNB, and show her a photo of the killer from the surveillance
footage. She claims not to know him! She does know what 20411 means,
though! Back in high school, she was assaulted by the killer during a
party in the woods, and didn't tell the cops about it! The 20411 was
the street address of his house.
Then it turns out that the guy was a
scumbag criminal who's been in jail for a decade, and now he's out,
looking for revenge. So, you're telling me that if the moment they'd
found out that the guy ways blind Garcia had just searched for
'violent criminals who are also blind' they'd have had him
immediately? Wow.
The killer takes the lady down to see
the corpses of all of his victims! She blinds him with a lamp and
then runs back upstairs! The guy turns off the lights, obvs, and we
get a chase scene! Not much of one, though, since the lady breaks the
window to yell for the team's help, and they stop to talk to her
rather than the SWAT guys continuing to charge in, which gives the
killer a chance to stab her in the back! What, lady, you've never
heard of closing a door behind you?
They find the killer in the attic, and
Matt shoots him to death!
THE END
Hey, remember when that lady got
stabbed in the back? We see her get put into the back of an
ambulance, but get no word about how she's doing! Thanks for that,
show!
We then see see the housewarming party
that was threatened at the start of the episode!
1 - Was profiling in any way helpful in
solving the crime?
No. At this point, are we really
expecting it to, though?
2 - Could the crime have been solved
just as easily using conventional police methods given the known
facts of the case?
Dogs would have solved the crime almost
immediately, so yes.
So, on a scale of 1 (Dirty Harry) to 10
(Tony Hill), How Useful Was Profiling in Solving the Crime?
1/10 - So, yeah, this episode couldn't
have happened at all. A couple was found brutally murdered in their
home with the eyes burned out of their heads. A quick google search
of the dead guy would have revealed that the dead guy was a doctor
who had gotten a patient to kill themselves through a risky
psychological procedure. They would have looked into his patients,
and found the killer fairly quickly.
Really, though, the doctor shouldn't
have gotten killed at all. The killer murdered his parents a week
earlier. These parents obviously have people in their lives who talk
to them. And I'd have to imagine that couple would have been nervous
about their murderously violent blind son getting out of jail, and
talked to people about it.
When those people never heard from
their friends again, the cops would have gotten a call, and this guy
would have been locked up.
2 comments:
Unless I missed something (and that is not impossible), there seems to be three stupid things in a row. The number comment, the first file found, and then the leap to the parents continuing the therapy. What gets me about this comment is that it is assumed to be true, she even looks angry at the parents for being so brutal. There is no proof that it happened, at all. This is very common in the last three or so seasons. Statements of possibilities, became statements of probability, became statements of certainty without proof. This seems to have coincided with the enlarged cast and the slow dumbing down of Garcia. The less I say about the duct tape the better, but jesus I felt like I was watching a bad wannabe student director film.
(sorry, to be clear the statements of certainty are ALWAYS right, which is why I find them stupid. One of the charms of the Gideon character and the first season of the show was when they got something wrong or off and refined their profile. Now they have to be right, all the time. (Reid never would have used cards in the past either...)
Post a Comment