In yet another SAW-type opening, we
find a guy hanging from the ceiling of a torture dungeon, with a bag
over his head! A killer shows up with the baseball bat and murders
him! Based on the victim's statements, he's probably a murderer.
Then we cut to Emily, who's making
dinner for FBI Guy! She doesn't like how the dinner is turning out,
though, so she calls Joe for advice! Turns out she was using cooking
wine instead of drinking wine! He's a snob, you see, and cares about
that sort of stuff. This gets into her head, though, and suggests
they order a pizza instead!
This is why you don't listen to cooking
snobs, people. Your tomato sauce will taste fine if you use cooking
wine.
The date goes fine until it's
interrupted by a phone call! It seems that the latest guy was a
lawyer - as was the previous victim! Was he a mob lawyer? Because he
sure talked like a scumbag! Both men where smashed to death with
baseball bats and then had their hearts cut out. Ick! The team
divvies up duties to go and look for info on the killer - who's
local, as most of their killers seem to be these days.
Seriously, they do not fly a ton. Does their new, lower budget mean they can't pull the jet set out of mothballs very often?
Seriously, they do not fly a ton. Does their new, lower budget mean they can't pull the jet set out of mothballs very often?
Then it's over to the killer, who makes
a fancy storage case for the victim's heart! Just like that guy did
back at the start of Season 3! Wait, has he been sprung from prison?
No, wait, he was dying and wanted to find a replacement mother for
his son, right? So he can't be the killer.
Garcia's already got good lead for them -
the last place the victim was scene was at his law office two days
before the body turned up. But Garcia has found footage from the
parking lot of that building - in it, a woman runs up to him and asks
him for a ride, and then gets into his car! But can Penelope's Big
Brother facial recognition technology figure out who she is?
Then it's over to the park, where the
lady pulls the exact same story about her dead car on a jogger! I
guess he's not suspicious because she's pretty, but if a woman came
up to me complaining of a dead car and wanted neither jumper cables
nor a phone to call a tow truck, but instead a ride to an apartment,
I'd be very suspicious! Obviously, he gives her the ride.
At the morgue, the ME tells them that
the men were beaten within an inch of their lives, but it was the
heart removal that finally did them in! Then things get even stranger
when we discover that the victims' ribs were broken with a hammer and
chisel, just like in that 3rd season episode! This makes the team
assume that the woman on the tape has an associate, because she's
obviously not strong enough to smash ribs on her own. This is idiocy,
of course - if you have a chisel and a hammer, the ribs are getting
smashed. Anyone can manage it, your strength level will just
determine how long it takes.
So... with the killer from that episode
long dead, who could this copycat be? He had a son who was like 10 or
11, so he'd be murdering age now. Didn't he also have a wife who
abandoned him and the son when he got sick? She could also be the
killer, I suppose. But why is this lady working with one of those two
people?
Then again, it's possible that this has
nothing to do with that case from Season 3 where Eddie Cibrian was
killing people, and the chisel extractions and bespoke heart storage
containers are just a complete coincidence.
I'd say it's weird that no one mentions
the connection, but the two people at the Morgue are Joe and Aisha -
she arrived 8 years after that case, and Joe got there like 3
episodes later, so it's not unreasonable that they wouldn't be
familiar with it.
At the new dump site Matt and Eric
don't find any evidence of value. They do reveal that the bodies were
dumped almost exactly 3 miles south-west of their abduction sites,
which might be significant. Except, you know, they don't know where
the men were abducted from. They just know where they were seen last.
Yes, this guy was probably abducted by the woman who got into his
car, but that's not a confirmed fact, and they have no idea what
happened with the first victim.
Then it's over to the torture dungeon,
where we see that the killer is, in fact, a young white guy, so I'm
guessing Eddie's son is the most likely suspect? But why is he
killing all of these people?
At base, the team has been able to
identify the woman from the parking lot, and it turns out that it's
not the woman from the park at all, just one that looks a lot like
her! Their assumption? The killer is hiring sex workers to lure the
men into traps, and then killing them so they won't talk! But why is
Eddie's son killing these men? The first two were lawyers... was one
or both of them involved in his father's case? I remember Eddie kept
the women for a couple of days because he was testing them out as
mothers. Is that why the son keeps these guys?
Actually, wait, I may be going crazy,
did Eddie even live in Virginia? Where was that one set? Also, if
this is related, the team should have noticed it by now - Emily and
JJ were both on the team during that case, and while Reid's off
teaching again, the two of them should have noticed the similarities
between the crimes.
The team rushes to the latest dump site
- will anyone comment on how weird it is that the killer's ritual has
gone from keeping them 48 hours to keeping the new guy for just
three? The new victim is a financial manager! JJ finally remembers
the Eddie case - although not entirely. Just a strange sense of deja
vu. I don't know why it's not Emily who thinks of it, though - she's
the one who actually went into the garage, saw the hearts, and was
threatened with a chisel. You'd think that would have stuck in her
mind.
At the office, we find out that sex
worker from the video isn't dead after all! She (and the park sex
worker) explain that a guy named Eddie (cute!) hired her to play a
prank on his dad's friend. So Eddie's son is, in fact, getting
revenge for people who slighted his father in some way!
Garcia finds a connection between the
victims! A woman who worked for the financial manager died under
suspicious circumstances, and the two other people who've been killed
were among those who were witnesses to his alibi on the night the
woman disappeared! In a cute note, the interview transcript we see
includes a reference to the Brett Kavanaugh hearings:
That's right, this guy also knew Squee!
Although he spelled it Squi.
The team decides it's time for a
profile! The killer must be trying to avenge the dead woman, but for
some reason he started with the witnesses who gave him an alibi
rather than the man who was investigated for the crime! That's a
weird choice.
Joe and Aisha go to talk to the dead
woman's mother - Penelope Ann Miller! Who I'll call Ann to avoid
confusion! Apparently she was a psychiatrist of some reknown, so I'm
going to assume that she's Eddie's son's psychiatrist, and she put
him up to murdering the guys she holds responsible for her daughter's
death. Whether she literally asked him to or just implied heavily
that he should do it by talking to him about her grief, she's
probably at the 'heart' of this.
Also, the killer's got to being
bankrolled by someone - he's already spent 20K on this project, and
that's just on the sex workers. Who knows how much the rent on that
torture basement is?
They interview Ann about the killer,
and she claims not to recognize the picture. She's openly happy that
the guys are getting killed, though, because she's sure the banker
killed her daughter, and the cops are covering it up!
Ann isn't any help, but Garcia hacks
into her client list, and discovers that the various first name on it
is Eddie's son! JJ makes the connection - it turns out those crimes
were in Milwaukee, and the killer moved at some point! Oh, and Eddie
only died in prison last year - apparently his cancer took longer to
do him in than he thought it would, and there was no reason to go on
a killing spree!
We cut over to the killer, murdering
the next guy. Weird that no one is talking about the fact that he's
speeding up his timeline so drastically.
Back at the office, Emily announces
that she checked in on the killer a few times after Eddie went to
prison, but then didn't bother doing that any more after he was
adopted by people in Mayland. That's right - they moved closer to
where Emily was, and that made Emily less likely to be interested in
helping out! You've got issues, Emily.
They find out about the new victim, and
it's another banker from the dead guy's firm! Weird that even though
they knew the pattern of the killings 24 hours ago they didn't go to
the guy's firm and his widow and give them a heads up about the fact
that everyone at the guy's bachelor party was on a death list. Also,
presumably the Baltimore police have that list of alibi witnesses as
well, so that could have spend things along. The team's sloppiness is
the only reason this latest guy died, is what I'm saying.
Aisha and Joe interrogate Ann, but her
lawyer keeps them from getting anything. Ann does say something
weird, though - that's it's possible the killer is murdering people
because of genetics, and for no other reason! Can they use that to
discredit her to him later on in the episode?
Garcia finds the latest sex worker ad
that the killer posts, and locks it so they can be the only one to
answer it! Then they send an FBI agent to meet the killer at a public
park. This is a fairly solid plan, actually. It doesn't work, though,
because the killer has been tipped off by Ann that the FBI is on to
him! So he calls the bait up and asks to speak to Emily, who he
remembers from back in the day!
Emily talks to him on the phone, and
half-apologizes for cutting him loose all of those years ago. Yeah,
all of these killings are kind of on you, lady. Then the guy says he
was destined to be a killer, like Dexter, but Emily says that's just
something Ann said to get him to murder for her! This leads to a foot
chase, followed by the killer getting away!
The team locks down the final victims
on the party list, and wonder what the killer's next move might be.
Emily notes that she told him that Ann was a liar who manipulated him
into murdering people for her - maybe check in on her?
For the record, it takes her like five
hours to have this idea. Does she want Ann to get killed?
Anyhoo, the team goes to check on Ann
but he's already been abducted. Luckily, based on the science of
magic, the team's geographic profile has confirmed what the killer's
comfort zone is!
Yeah, that's not really possible,
though? Because all of the guys were kidnapped relatively close to
where they worked, and then their bodies were dumped a set distance
away. But the geographic profile suggests that they should look at a
tiny town on a peninsula leading on the bay? That's not how anything
works, team. Also, in an attempt to cheat, we see the big map with
the locations on it, but then when it's time for the zoom in, they
move to a different map, hoping we won't notice that the place they
decide to look is well to the east of every other point of data on
the map.
The geographic profile doesn't really
matter, though - the torture dungeon is owned by Ann's uncle. The
team rushes over there while the killer menaces Ann, and then Emily
tries to talk him out of killing her! Ann confesses to her crimes,
hoping it will save her life, and it works!
THE END
Back at the office, Emily laments that
she wasn't able to help the killer more, back when he needed it! She
keeps talking about how she wasn't able to look out for him, but
that's not actually true, is it? Like, you could have checked in on
him during the four more years you lived in Virginia, and then kept
in touch long-distance once you moved to London. You just didn't.
Maybe that was because of your tsuris over the Liam Doyle's son
situation, but in any event, no one was stopping you from helping.
She goes for another date with the FBI
Guy! She admits to being emotionally closed-off!
1 - Was profiling in any way helpful in
solving the crime?
Nope! There was a direct connection
between all of the criminals.
2 - Could the crime have been solved
just as easily using conventional police methods given the known
facts of the case?
It was solved via traditional means.
So, on a scale of 1 (Dirty Harry) to 10
(Tony Hill), How Useful Was Profiling in Solving the Crime?
1/10 - Here's the thing - there's no
way this guy should have been able to abduct Ann. They knew that she
was putting him up to the crimes. They had to assume the two were in
some kind of contact, since the killer had tens of thousands of
dollars to throw around with no visible means of support or
employment. There's no reason to think that this woman wouldn't have
been under strict surveillance in the hopes of catching them when
they got in touch with one another.
The show tries to explain this by
having Ann's lawyer say that he'll sue them if they start tailing her
without good cause, but the team never listens to lawyers, and they
also had good cause. So yeah, the whole ending of the episode makes
no sense!
No comments:
Post a Comment