The episode opens with JJ standing
uncomfortably in Emily's office! This is a rough hand she's been
dealt! JJ starts off the scene by making a strange accidental
admission, saying "I don't want to be unit chief, not like
this.' So you do want to be unit chief, you just don't like the way
it happened. Interesting that you would half-lie like that. Also,
she's really not the kind of person you should trust with any power
whatsoever, because her first response in this new situation is to
wonder how she can use her power to go after Barnes, destroying her
before she ruins the team.
Yeah, whatever her motives are, she's
only able to go after the team because you so often break the rules
and do whatever you want. So it doesn't speak well towards your
self-awareness that your initial reaction to being told that you're
thought of as loose cannons is to say 'Obviously she's lying, how can
we bend or break the rules to ruin her career?'
Joe, for his part, says that they
should just do a good job, by the book, so she'll have nothing to use
against them. It's a great idea, but weird to hear coming from the
sleaziest member of the team.
In St. Louis, a group of young people
are hanging out in a house! Someone comes in, ties them all up, and
stabs them to death! According to Garcia the next day, the cops think
it's a robby gone wrong, which is crazy, because you generally don't
see massive amounts of stabbing in situations like that. Also, who's
going to rob four young working people?
Barnes then arrives, announcing that
they're taking the case because from now on she only wants the team
to focus on high-visibility cases that are easy to solve. What do you
think they've been doing up until now? They don't get called in on
anything other than the most outre crimes, and always wrap them up
within 72 hours. There's a guy with a skull tattoo on his hand,
driving up and down a major interstate right now, murdering children,
and the team doesn't think it's worth their time because it would be
hard work to investigate it.
How is her new policy going to change
anything?
The team recoils at the possibility of
Barnes coming along on the trip because she's not a 'profiler'. As if
profilers are the only people who can solve crimes? As if most of
their crimes aren't solved when they just ask Garcia who did it? The
team is openly insubordinate, and Reid announces that if she's going
on the flight, then he's not!
Somehow, he isn't immediately suspended
without pay. You know, for a villain, she's not great at using her
authority to get what she wants. She's coming after this team for
being unprofessional, and now they're being even more unprofessional
when they find out their being investigated. Seriously, how does Reid
still have a job at this point?
He's already proven himself to be the opposite of indispensable - he was off the team for half of last year, and their clearance rate was completely unaffected.
On the plane, we get some details about
the dead housemates. None of them were coupled up, and all were
successful. Also, their house was a party hub of some kind! Also,
none of them seem to have a significant other of any kind, which is a
little weird, since there are four of them.
Garcia tracks down three other people
who rented rooms at the house - two have good alibis, and one is
completely unaccounted for! Barnes thinks this makes him a prime
suspect, and she's right!
On the way to the crime scene, Barnes
feels Joe out about whether he's ready to retire, and he gets
super-snippy with her. It's like he's forgotten that he already
retired once, and they can revoke his badge any time they want to.
Also, he's well into normal retirement ago. Seriously, why are all of
these people acting so unprofessionally when they're being
investigated for not being professional?
At the crime scene, they notice that a
window by the front door was broken from the inside - so the break-in
was staged! Why would you even bother to do that? Just leave the door
ajar, people can draw whatever conclusions they like. They figure
that the killer must have had a gun to keep all the victims cowed
while they were tied up. But why stab them, then - was it about being
quiet, or was stabbing the point all along? Notably - the knife was
left at the crime scene, embedded in the final victim.
Upstairs a tech guy finds a knife case
under one of the victim's beds! So the killer went there, grabbed the
knife, and then returned the empty case to its hiding place. Very
strange behaviour! That level of familiarity with the crime scene
suggests the killer is definitely someone who knew the victims.
In DC, Reid goes to see Emily, who
thinks he shouldn't have thrown a hissy fit that morning! He says he
didn't want to go with Barnes and help her dismantle the team. So...
he thought that by being incredibly unprofessional, that was going to
give her less evidence to use against Emily? Emily makes my point for
me - thanks! Then Reid notices that she's packing up her goods and
getting ready to leave.
Reid doesn't want her to quit, but Emily says that if she steps down, it'll take off the heat for how badly they botched Roswell.
Wow, should they have shot that guy in
Roswell. Not only does it make more sense for the plot of that
episode, but if they'd shot an innocent man, then this entire story
arc would make so much more sense. Who on earth changed their mind
about that plot, and how did they not see that it was going to
invalidate all of the plans they'd had for the rest of the season?
Barnes and JJ arrive at the police
station, and Barnes is even more of a jerk to the local cops than she
is everyone else! She's weirdly abrasive, in a way that you'd think
someone who's made it all the way to the top of the FBI would know
not to be.
Garcia then calls in with info about
their suspect! He's a violent, drunken jerk who was recently thrown
out of the house by a vote amongst the residents! Which I guess means
he can't be the killer, since he has the most obvious motive and
background, and this is a show that loves its twists.
Aisha and Barnes go to talk to one of
the housemates who wasn't murdered, and Barnes says they need her to
establish motive - but Aisha announces that they don't put words in
people's mouths. Um... do you not know how the FBI operates, Aisha?
Spending too much time in an ivory tower? They use coerced
confessions all the time.
The housemate says that Larry can't be
the killer. Also they were secretly dating, because it was against
the rules to date within the house. Then she tells them where to find
him! It's not fast enough, though, because the killer is able to
sneak into Larry's car and kill him by putting a plastic shopping bag
over his head.
Yes, seriously. I know that you or I
would just pop a hole in the plastic bag and resume breathing with a
little bit of difficulty, but Larry is an idiot, and dies
immediately.
Well, not immediately, it seems - the
killer waited until he was unconscious and then gave him a drug
overdose! He also left a fake suicide note in the car. Barnes is
ready to call it a day, but then the test results proved that there
were no drugs in his system! So I was wrong, and the bag was the
murder weapon, and the killer was so dumb that he just injected
heroin into a corpse, assuming that no one would be able to tell the
difference! Not dealing with a rocket surgeon this week, are they?
Did they even need a toxicology report,
though? The guy had a plastic bag pulled tight over his head. There
would be large red welts all over his neck from where the killer
yanked on it. That alone should have forced them to question the
drugs.
Reid asks why Emily is so ready to
quit, and she admits about destroying the recording of him confessing
to murder! She says she doesn't deserve to run the team, and should
just go back to Interpol! None of this is wrong, of course, but let's
see if they try to wriggle out of it, nonetheless?
Matt and Joe go through the victims'
personal effects. Each one of them has just a single box of those, so
the scene won't be too complicated to shoot. They find evidence that
all the dead people were good buddies, and Ray, one of the dead guys,
was their leader! I wonder how that factors into the murders?
Barnes then talks to Eric, and applauds
him for letting Scratch die. She suggests he'd be happier chasing
fugitives if he's so happy killing people! Eric says no, he's find
being deep in the background of 8-person scenes.
Matt, Aisha, and Barnes go to talk to
the housemate, and Barnes tells them not to let her know that the
boyfriend is dead. She thinks that this will cause her to shut down
before they get their information, which isn't a bad call, really.
But Aisha botches the situation by saying that they found Larry, and
that he's no longer a suspect, rather than just saying that they're
still looking for him, which is less suspicious.
They ask her if anyone hung around the house, never really fitting in, and she immediately thinks of Justin, a loser they know.
When they leave the room, Aisha also
snaps at Barnes - how are all of these people still in the FBI if
they're this bad at following orders and obeying the chain of
command?
Garcia looks into the killer, and finds
that he's an internet troll who spends all of his time trying to
start fights online! That's not as useful as his address, but thanks?
For once, they do the smart thing, and get cops to meet the other
possible victim when her plane lands.
More with Emily and Reid! He
second-guesses her, and suggests that she shouldn't have buried the
evidence against him! If she hadn't, he'd be rotting in a Mexican
prison, so I don't know exactly what his point is. Reid says that it
doesn't matter how many crimes they commit, so long as they stay
together as a family and fight for each other!
You know that this is the exact behaviour and attitude that Barnes is coming after you for, right? Like, you're proving her point over and over again with every word you say?
Despite the obvious flaw in Reid's
reasoning, Emily is convinced, and decides to try and keep her job!
Because, seriously, what else was she going to do? It's not like
Emily has a life outside of her work, the way Aaron does.
While the team preps their attempt to
take the killer down, Emily and JJ chat about how best to deal with
the killer if they have to talk him down. Their plan? Talk about how
awesome he is to get him to lower his guard! So, the thing they do
literally all the time. Good note.
In the killer's apartment, they
discover that the killer had purchased copies of Ray, the lead
victim's, wardrobe! Perhaps he was obsessed with becoming Ray? But
why? Could Ray have been sleeping with the other absent housemate,
who the killer was in love with, and that's why the killer planned
the murder for when she was out of the country working as a flight
attendant?
This is all fun theorizing, but it's
not super-relevant, since they already know who the killer is.
At the office, Barnes asks Matt why the
team seems to be made up entirely of insubordinate assholes, and he
says that's a normal response of people when threatened. It isn't if
you're a professional, but let's move on - she claims she's not there
to tear apart the team, but what else could be motivating this
behaviour?
The team finds the killer waiting by
the flight attendant's car, and they set up an ambush, gradually
moving people out of the area making as little fuss as possible. At
the same time, they bring the flight attendant into the garage to
their staging area for the takedown. Why would they do that? The
killer is like a hundred feet away. Maybe he can't see her, but why
take a chance? Shouldn't you have her locked up in the airport's
security office?
Aisha and Eric aim their guns at the
killer, and he puts a gun to his own head, and says that if he
doesn't get to see the flight attendant, he'll kill himself! Who
cares if he does that, though?
Apparently Barnes does, so she wants to
send the flight attendant in! The first rule of hostage-style
situations is that you don't ever send in the person that the gunman
wants to see. Because they'll then try to kill the person or they'll
kill themselves.
Barnes says that bringing in the wife
in Central Park worked a couple of weeks ago, why not try it now?
Well, maybe because that was an unarmed man who had no intention of
hurting his 'hostage', and he didn't ask to see his wife. Could that
be the difference?
Barnes, who turns out to be both an
idiot and a psychopath, then grabs the flight attendant and drags her
into the parking lot! This leads to the flight attendant immediately
getting shot because the team is really, really slow on their trigger
fingers. They do kill him, though, a second too late.
THE END
The flight attendant had a bullet-proof
vest on, so she's fine, but how on earth did they get the flight
attendant to agree to come out and see the killer? Why would she have
done that? Did Barnes threaten her or something? This whole scene
makes no sense.
On the plane, JJ says that they'll use
Barnes' attempt to get the flight attendant killed against her if she
keeps coming after the team! But will that dissuade her?
Back at Quantico, the team does some
self-congratulating over temporarily defeating Barnes, but will the
victory hold?
No, it won't. Barnes shows up, having
already gone to the director with her crazy lie about the team
screwing up the case. Even though she dragged a woman in front of a
crazed killer and then that woman got shot by said crazed killer.
So... this show doesn't think much of Chris Wray's intellect, huh?
Anyhoo, Barnes shows up and announces
that she's changing things up. Emily, Garcia, and Aisha are
reassigned, Joe's forced into retirement, Reid can teach full time if
he wants to stay, so the team is now just JJ, Eric, and Matt!
Well, I've been complaining about cast
bloat for a while now, but these seems like a drastic overcorrection.
1 - Was profiling in any way helpful in
solving the crime?
Slightly! They were able to judge based
on how well the killer knew the house that he doubtlessly was someone
all the housemates were familiar with!
2 - Could the crime have been solved
just as easily using conventional police methods given the known
facts of the case?
Interviewing all of the surviving
housemates about everyone in their lives would have sussed the guy
out pretty quickly, so yes.
So, on a scale of 1 (Dirty Harry) to 10
(Tony Hill), How Useful Was Profiling in Solving the Crime?
3/10 - It's shocking how incredibly
unprofessional the team was this week. Yes, I know they were under
pressure, but instead of quietly doing their best job and letting the
results stand for themselves, they each took every opportunity to be
as hostile as possible to the person on whose whim their fates
depended.
It's weird what a bad job the show did
of defending the team - everything Barnes said about the team is
completely accurate, but instead of taking a moment to reflect on
this, the show just reveals her to be a complete idiot who almost
gets a woman killed for no reason.
It's like they're actively trying to
avoid having to grapple with some hard truths about the team. Weird.
And once again, I can't help but stress
how much better this storyline would have worked if the team had
actually shot the conspiracy theorist in Roswell. Make that change
and while this isn't necessarily a great storyline, it instantly
becomes one that makes perfect sense.
This episode was so terrible I never
ever got a chance to once again ding the show for completely
misunderstanding the meaning of the term 'family annihilator'.
No comments:
Post a Comment