It's 2004, and we open in a
interrogation room inside the San Diego field office of the FBI.
There's gothed-out lady sitting at the table. We don't see her face
right away, but it's obviously Penelope, right? This is when she got
caught for hacking? I don't know why, but I guess I always assumed it
had happened earlier. Had she really only been working with the team
for a month or two when the first episode started?
Greg enters the room to chat with
Penelope about her crimes, and they don't do a very good job of
making either of them look a decade younger. That takes more
expensive computers than are available to the people at Criminal
Minds.
Greg immediately offers her a job
because someone talented at hacking into pharmaceutical companies
would naturally have the skills and temperament necessary to hunt
serial killers. Preferring a job to jail, Penelope signs up. Then
Derek comes in, and wow, did they not bother at all to try younging
him down:
That's some preposterous facial hair
for you to have had back in 2004, Derek. I know Shemar Moore wouldn't
want to shave it and grow it back for continuity reasons, but wow,
should he have been written up for looking unprofessional. On the
other hand, it's nice to know that at some point in his life, he was
capable of dressing like a professional!
In a super-cute scene, we then cut to
Quantico in the present day, where they're having a sexual harassment
seminar because of Penelope and Derek's incredibly unprofessional
behaviour! Greg then pulls Garcia out of the meeting to go and visit
the attorney general - I guess something from Garcia's days as 'The
Black Queen' (of course she'd be a big X-Men fan) have come back to
haunt her!
It seems that when Garcia was
recruited, the team was also in town to arrest a super-hacker who
also killed a bunch of sex workers! And now the Justice Department
website has been hacked to demand justice for the guy! It seems that
a bunch of online would-be sleuths have decided that he's innocent,
and are making a fuss until the case is reopened. So the team is
going to do just that!
Because they're known for giving in to the demands of extremists, I guess?
Let's find out after the credits!
On the flight, they go over the details
of the old case. The guy was arrested because he was known to local
sex workers as a creep, and then in the interview he confessed to all
the murders. Interestingly, some victims were stabbed, and others
were strangled - could there have been more than one killer? But why
would he confess to everything?
Greg and JJ drop by the prison to talk
to the killer. He claims that he was high on Ritalin for the better
part of a year, just hacking non-stop, and so the cop on the case
kept him high so that he could trick the hacker into thinking he was a
killer, going so far as to feed him all the details of the cases!
That's pretty plausible, actually. Cops are generally just happy when
they can say a crime has been solved, and if they can put a guy in
jail who they think is a villain anyway, all the better! They want
him to turn over the hackers who are helping him, but he points out
that this is a crazy thing to do, since they're helping him.
Which is another good point. Solid work, potential killer.
In a weird note, the potential killer
keeps a rosary with him all the time. He says he made it himself, out
of his own hair - but it's like a foot long and clearly brown, and he has super-short
grey hair. Did he have ultra-long hair at one point in his
imprisonment, and now he's cut it? If not, that's a super-suspicious
thing to have.
Joe, Jeanne, and Reid go to the cop's
house to get the truth out of him, and there's a pretty funny
exchange where he's willing to swear 'on a stack of bibles' that he
didn't drug the guy, but then they point out that he's got a whole
lot of atheism books, so that phrase means nothing to him! I'd focus
less on his reading material, and more on the fact that he had no
evidence against the guy other than his confession, and he's acting
incredibly defensive.
Garcia and Derek look over the computer
system that the hackers broke into, and Garcia says that she's got a
slight chance of getting the case files back, since the tools the
hackers built are based on some code she wrote a decade earlier, but
she's not sure! Also she thinks Derek and her should cut it out with
the super-unprofessional work talk. Which, yeah, you should have done
that years ago.
Has Garcia given them the names and any
lead information she might have on all of her contacts from her days
in the San Diego hacker scene? Seems like if they're using her tools,
there's a good chance she's got a lead on some of them, right?
Then Garcia sees a 'meow meow' message
in the trojan horse code, and runs to find Greg! Really, she runs to
find him. She doesn't just, you know, call him on his phone, since
she has no idea where he is in the building.
Meanwhile, the real killer has hire two
sex workers to come to his murder loft! And based on his voice as he
says the word 'welcome', I discover that he's played by genre
superstar Jeffrey Combs!
I'm going to be embarrassed if that
turns out to be wrong, but I feel like I'm right, just like when I
identified Ray Wise by his eyes at the start of last season.
He gives them two glasses of wine to
drink, and they readily accept them, even though he's not drinking.
Are they not worried about being drugged? I feel like accepting a
drink from a client you've never met before is a major no-no in the
sex worker world, although that's just a guess.
Garcia rounds everyone up for a
conversation about the hack! It turns out that the hacker used her
old signature for the crime, since he was ticked at her for joining
the FBI. She thinks that the only person who would do that is her old
boyfriend/hacking partner Pablo Costanzo! I'd say that it's kind of
stupid of him to include code that would specifically call out the
FBI's main anti-hacker force, but maybe he's just a prideful idiot.
Then we cut back to Jeffrey, who has
drugged the two sex workers into paralysis, and cuts them up as they
beg for their lives, terrified! See, that's why you don't drink
things given to you by new clients.
So, how did this guy not kill anyone for ten years, and why is he starting again now?
Although, I guess it's just as likely
the Jeffrey is just a buddy of the real killer, who's still in jail,
and wants to make it look like the killer is still out there to help
his case. If that's not the answer, though, they'll need a good
explanation for why he's back.
I'm sure this will be explained, but
did they already find the loft where the women were murdered? After
all, they came to his address, so obviously other people know about
it. Or is this going to be like that ridiculous painter episode where
he hired and killed a model, and everyone was like 'how could we
possibly figure out where he lives?!?' as if she didn't tell anyone
where she was going?
Back at the prison, they ask the inmate
how to get in touch with Pablo, and he responds that the guy will
only talk to Penelope, and they have to set up a meeting online. Greg
gets this info by telling the inmate that he thinks he's innocent,
which he most certainly doesn't, but the guy's easy to deceive.
Time for the profile! They tell the
assembled cops that either this is the original killer back, or a
copycat trying to spring the real killer! They offer zero insight to
personality or possible age/race of the killer, and end the profile
having given no actionable information to the cops. At least it's a
short profile scene this week.
Garcia gets a big character scene,
where she talks about her screwed-up relationship with Pablo, but
it's not relevant to the case, so let's move on.
Garcia goes to meet Pablo at his
workplace, a gaming center, and shows off by shutting down their
internet on a whim, then turning it back on just as quickly. Wait, if
this guy publicly works at a job under his own name, why did you have
to go to the killer and IRC to find him?
Garcia plays head games by kissing a
nerd instead of Pablo, then agrees that they need to talk about
things. To explain the nerd thing - Pablo thinks she still has
feelings for him, and asks her to prove she doesn't by kissing him.
She kisses a nerd instead, proving... what? The only thing that
proves is that she's so daunted by the prospect of kissing Pablo that
she'd kiss a stranger to avoid doing it. Which is kind of the
opposite of the point she was trying to make.
Over at HQ, we learn that the two sex
workers were contacted and hired online by Jeffrey, but then he used
his hacking skills to erase their correspondence! Except he couldn't
erase them having told people where they were going, which they
absolutely would have done, since they were both going to see him for
the first time, as established by the fact that they thought the
place he lived (converted loft in an industrial building) was
strange. So yeah, he should be caught already.
More character stuff with Pablo and
Garcia - he thinks she's infantilized herself with all of the 'baby
girl' nonsense, and he's shocked that she's no longer the strong,
confident woman he loved. He may actually have a point here, Garcia,
for all of her good characteristics, is kind of a spineless squish
who has trouble sticking up for herself. Also he thinks that there
might have been two killers, and that one of them could be a cop! His
theory gets glossed over, however, as she wants to focus on
relationship stuff, and he accuses her of purposefully getting
herself caught to get out of her relationship with him.
Meanwhile, Jeffrey offers some wine to
another sex worker in his pad (which, again, should be crawling with
cops by now), but she refuses, because she's not an idiot. She tries
to text someone from the bathroom about what a creep Jeffrey is, but
there's no signal because he's tricked-out his apartment! So Jeffrey
storms in and slaps her, then injects her with a needle, because it's
important for his method to drug the women so that they're awake but
helpless while being murdered. Weird.
The next day the team is adding the
newest victim to the crime board, and we discover that she, like the
other sex workers, had moved her business online. Greg theorizes that
because this is the third victim in a row whose business info they
can't locate, maybe Jeffrey isn't hacking their online presence,
maybe they're just good at hiding from cops! Well, if that's the
case, then there's definitely people who should know where they are
and who they were with.
Also, how incredibly lucky is Jeffrey
that none of these women have drivers? I'm not familiar with how
out-call-girls work in San Diego, but I've heard that it's a common
practice for them to have a driver to take them to jobs, and function
as a scary guy downstairs in case something goes wrong. The one time
I noticed a sex worker in my building I was able to identify her
because she was accompanied by a guy with the look of a bouncer, so I
feel like it's not an unusual occurrence.
Jeanne brings in one of the latest
victim's clients, and she explains that - in an amazing coincidence,
she helped set up the app-based scheduling system that the sex worker
used after quitting her agency! That's going to save us some time! It
seems that her account erases itself if she doesn't log in every 12
hours, to keep the cops from being able to find her black book. Isn't
it a little weird that this show is positing a bizarre alternate
dimension where sex workers are only concerned about being arrested,
and are utterly naive about the threat posed to them by clients?
In a hilarious attempt to make her
skillset seem relevant, Jeanne announces that the step-by-step guide
to setting up a secret online sex work business was written by the
inmate! Because she - in the last 48 hours - became so familiar with
his writing style that she's able to recognize it, even though here
he's just written an instructional manual.
Ugh.
Penelope and Pablo get into a duel over
an online card game and chat window. He points out that she used to
believe in revolution, and this freaks her out, so Derek assures her
that she can get the better of Pablo by playing his game and letting
him think he's won. The theory being that he's still so broken up
over her dumping him, that he'll do anything to come out of this with
his ego repaired. Probably a good plan, actually.
Then they profile that Pablo is jealous
of her and Derek, and she offers to publicly humiliate herself and
Derek if the hackers find the killer first - but only if it's a fair
fight, they have to trade info, the original casefile for the
profile.
We know who's getting the better end of
that deal, since the profile was 'we think he might be a hacker'.
Apparently the file showed plenty of
evidence that the inmate had a hacking partner who handled money and
equipment while inmate did the heavy code lifting - perhaps that guy
was the killer, and let inmate take the fall for his crimes! So they
figure that the two men are still working together, and the plan was
to let one take the fall, then some time later commit copycat crimes
and get the guy out!
Which is just a terrible plan, since,
unless Jeffrey plans on turning himself in, it involves getting a
court to let a guy off death row just because someone has starting
killing people using his old M.O. - which would never happen. It's
not like the guy is offering some proof that he's the killer, he's
just stabbing and strangling prostitutes - not even using some
special method that only the police and the killer knew about.
Greg and JJ confront the inmate, and
things go a little nuts. They announce that they figured out a
difference in the killers' MOs! It seems the original killer like to
wrap the victims' hair around their necks as he strangled them, and
even tore some out - but the new killer doesn't do that! JJ says that
the rosary must be made of hair from victims that the killer has been
sending the inmate, as a way of proving to him that the plan is still
going strong.
So, wait - there's a bunch of victims
they don't know about, then? That's the first we're hearing about
this. Also, if the killer knew enough about the inmate's hair fetish
to send him hair for a rosary, why wouldn't he have kept tearing hair
out during these new crimes? He'd obviously done it in the unknown
victims so he could send the locks of hair to the inmate, right? I
say that he must have, because if those hair in the rosary don't have
roots for DNA testing, they're useless as evidence, so why is Greg so
quick to grab them and drop them in an evidence bag?
Then Greg wins the Prentiss Award of
the night with this confusing line:
Hold everything, Greg, just stop it,
please. I need this explained... your plan is to: withdraw the
charges and halt the execution for the murders he actually committed,
and then charge him for the 'other four' murders, that Jeffrey
committed?
What? Huh? Wha?
Your operating theory originally was
that Jeffrey committed all the murders, and this guy took the fall,
secure that he'd be spring later. Then you said that there were two
different killers, and the original four killings were done by a hair
fetishist, which the inmate absolutely is. The second theory - which
this whole scene is about establishing - states that the guy you're
talking to is the original killer. And you want to let him skate on
the murders he committed in the hopes that you can find some way to
charge him as an accomplice in the new ones?
Also, what do you mean 'other four'
cases? We only knew about three dead sex workers in this episode.
Unless you're talking about the rosary hair donors, who would
presumably push the total up way higher. And why are you calling it
'retrying' him, if these are new cases that no one has been charge
with yet? If I steal a car, and go to jail, then get sprung, and
steal another car, you're not 'retrying' me for the new car theft.
It's a separate crime.
God, this show is a complete mess.
Then we cut back to Pablo at his
workplace, looking at the profile of the inmate's partner. His
co-worker at the store starts asking him how he got the file, and
it's only at this moment that I notice that this character is played
by Jeffrey Combs, and is the killer.
It's weird - normally when a killer's face is pointedly not shown, I'd suspect that he would be one of the characters we're meeting, but because I immediately recognized the voice as Combs', I stopped looking for the killer and started waiting for Jeffrey Combs to arrive onscreen! Bravo, Jeffrey, this was quite a performance this week!
Pablo points out that the FBI has no
leads other than that the killer is a hacker, and Jeffrey's all like
'great! So I can frame you and they'll be none the wiser!' Then Pablo
falls over because his drink has been drugged. So, his plan was to
make them think that the killer killed himself? That seems like even
more of a stretch, especially since serial killers rarely do that
until they're caught, and the FBI had zero leads as far as anyone
knew.
In the next scene the FBI busts into
Pablo's workplace, without offering any information about how or why
they should be there. Seriously, in the last scene we saw them
figuring out that a copycat friend of inmates was committing the
crimes. How did they go from there to kicking down the door of a
guy's business? In the scene directly after this one, they're still
referring to Jeffrey as 'Unsub', so I guess they don't know who he is
- but since they never thought Pablo was the killer, why kick down
the door?
Anyhow, they find some drugs ordered in
Pablo's name, and sent to the killer's apartment, so it's off to
rescue Pablo as Jeffrey plans to murder him! They get there just as
he's administering a lethal overdose of oxycodone. Luckily there was
some epinephrine in the killer's drug kit for no reason, so he's
brought halfway around - and Penelope gets him the rest of the way
there by telling him that if he dies then she'll publicly say she
beat him!
That, naturally, does the trick. Along
with more epinephrine.
The End.
Except for more character stuff with
Penelope and Pablo, and then Penelope and Derek!
1 - Was profiling in any way helpful in
solving the crime?
I have literally no idea how they
solved the crime this week. If there was a scene explaining it, it
was left on the cutting room floor. They talked to the inmate, had as
confusing a conversation I've ever seen, then stormed out of the room
announcing that they were going to get him off the hook for murders
he committed, and then charge him with ones he didn't.
Then they're busting down the door to
Jeffrey and Pablo's shop because...
I have no idea. The inmate gave them
nothing whatsoever. They could have been busting down the door to
catch either Pablo or Jeffrey, but since they had no evidence
pointing to either of them - they never even knew who Jeffrey was! I
have zero idea how they got there.
This episode made no sense.
2 - Could the crime have been solved
just as easily using conventional police methods given the known
facts of the case?
Yes. The killer invited sex workers to
his home, then murdered them in his home. Either their drivers or the
people they told about the job would have turned Jeffrey in rather
quickly. This would have been so much more plausible if he'd just
picked them up off the street, but they decided to go with a cyber
twist that made everything more idiotic.
So, on a scale of 1 (Dirty Harry) to 10
(Tony Hill), How Useful Was Profiling in Solving the Crime?
0
I know this is a slightly controversial
score, since the team did catch the killer, but I can't give them any
points because the show doesn't offer any reason for them to be
kicking down that door at that moment. If they'd offered the
slightest justification for that scene, fine, but they don't. So I
have to give them zero points.
I seriously still have no idea what was
happening in that final prison scene. Not just the rosary/charges
stuff, also their theory that he wrote a FAQ about helping sex
workers dodge the cops so that they would be easier victims for
serial killers! How would you know that the victim you found was
using your anonymizing steps and not keeping a log of where she was
going and when? You wouldn't, because of course you couldn't! Also,
again, drivers!
Also, a comment on this review made me realize something I hadn't considered - how on earth would they hope to get a conviction against the hacker this time? It's been ten years, they have no new evidence, the detective's story is super-shaky, and the public is far more aware of/less patient with shady things the cops do. I guess they could try to get Jeffrey Combs to try and testify against him, but why would he? Then who would be on the outside in ten years, killing people to try and spring him from jail?
Also, a comment on this review made me realize something I hadn't considered - how on earth would they hope to get a conviction against the hacker this time? It's been ten years, they have no new evidence, the detective's story is super-shaky, and the public is far more aware of/less patient with shady things the cops do. I guess they could try to get Jeffrey Combs to try and testify against him, but why would he? Then who would be on the outside in ten years, killing people to try and spring him from jail?
Wow, this show is terrible.
5 comments:
Greg’s plan was to drop the charges for the murders he falsely confessed to (the stabbings) and retry him the murders he did commit 10 years prior (the stranglings).
That might be what he means, but it's not what he says - and it's especially confusing because he refers to the 'first murders' and the 'other murders'. Which would only make sense if Jeffrey Combs had stabbed four women, and then he'd strangled four women, but in fact they alternated. In any event, all Greg has achieved is getting a guy off death row, and making it more likely that he'll walk free.
Best case scenario, the guy dies in fifteen years, the government having spent another 300 million dollars.
Worst case scenario: Guy walks free, because there's still no evidence for 4 of the 8 original murder that they believe he committed. Can you imagine what a field day the defense attorney would they'd have in court over this? "He was drugged, kept awake for days, forced to sign a false confession, and then jailed for a decade. Now, they want to convict him again because what, a woman from the FBI said that he looked at her hair too long? (Prosecutor tries to bring up rosary, but fails to because it doesn't have hair from any of the women he's charged with killing.) This is the definition of prosecutorial overreach, and I demand a directed verdict of innocence, so that we can begin our state for wrongful prosecution!
Then, after he's out, the guy starts killing women in the hopes of cheering up Jeffrey Combs.
Thanks, Greg.
"So Jeffrey storms in and slaps her, then injects her with a needle, because it's important for his method to drug the women so that they're awake but helpless while being murdered. Weird."
This is nearly the exact same MO as season 1/2's Frank, sans killing RV.
San Jose not San Diego
"I have literally no idea how they solved the crime this week"
"I have no idea"
Becuase you r an idiot.
Post a Comment