A woman is woken from her rest by a
phone call. On the line is a child-like voice saying 'I'm gonna get
you', It's obviously been happening a lot lately, so she hangs up the
phone in anger. Her husband enters the bedroom, asking about the
call. She says that it's frustrating that cops wouldn't investigate
the calls. Would you have to investigate them? Couldn't you just
check your call display? Also, making harassing phone calls is a
crime, and there's no reason they wouldn't be able to file a police
report, especially if this has been going on for some time.
The wife asks the husband to talk to
the retired cop at his workplace and see if there's anything that can
be done. Although I don't know what that would be, if they live in a
place where cops won't charge people with crimes.
Anyway, the husband says it's not worth
worrying about, and that the kid will get bored of calling. I don't
doubt that the guy would be this much of a jerk about his wife's
concerns, but it's still rough to watch. Also, maybe he made the
call? He walked into the room immediately after it ended, so that's
not impossible. Like how in Scream they wanted you to think Dewey
might be the killer by having him be unreachable in his room while
the killer was calling Sydney at Tatum's house.
The next day when the couple wakes up
and preps breakfast, they're dealt two nasty surprises! 1: Their son
is missing, and 2: their front door is covered in blood!
The only conclusion? Their son has been
kidnapped by people who are very bad at reading the bible! It's the
people with blood on their doors who don't lose their kids, dummies.
Moments after the discovery of the
door, the child voice calls back to claim responsibility for the
crime! The dad is standing right there, though, so obviously he's not
the one making the calls.
We cut immediately to the briefing
room, where Garcia is running down the case. Has she gotten a raise
now that she does twice as much work? I certainly hope so.
They try to explain the police's
non-response by saying that they had determined no laws had been
broken. Which is just wrong. It's absolutely a crime to phone people
and threaten them, even if you're just a child. The problem is that
there's no way for the writers to get around this problem - for the
story there need to have been a bunch of calls, but if the cops had
looked into it they'd have either found out who the criminal was, or
that they were using extreme measures to disguise the call's origin.
Of course, if the second was true,
they'd have escalated the case, because a child wouldn't have the
ability to mask a call, and an adult making these calls while
pretending to be a child is immediately more threatening.
So the show just gives bad advice to
the audience, telling them that if they're getting days worth of
creepy and intimidating phone calls, there's nothing they can do
about it.
Thanks, show.
Then we get an interesting reveal -
Mandy dealt with a case just like this fifteen years ago! Creepy
calls, abducted kid, the whole thing.
Joe and Greg then win a Prentiss Award
for this exchange:
Um, if that's the case, you don't need
to rush. He's already dead. Here's the timeline - the parents notice
the child is missing, and call the police. The cops show up, talk to
them, realize how serious the situation is, decide to call in the
FBI. That goes through proper channels until it gets to Garcia, who
approves the case, and calls the team together.
That whole process had to have taken at
least two hours - especially since Garcia has had time to put
together a visual presentation including a photo of the kid and the
bloody door:
So even if, miraculously, the child was
abducted one second before the parents woke up, it's still been more
than two hours since the abduction, since the parents had to spend at
least half an hour getting dressed and ready for the day.
Also, the team is now going to spend
more than two hours on a plane heading for St. Louis, where this all
happened. So yeah, if the killer is known for killing kids within two
hours, you haven't got a prayer.
Then the show cuts to some footage of
the investigation, for no reason that I can think of.
Credits!
On the plane, they do some random
rambling. The kid liked video games, so Garcia will search a list of
everyone he played with online in hopes of finding a pedophile! They
also suggest that the phone voice must be a new kid, since the
original one would be all grown up by now! Or, you know, it's just
the killer doing a voice. They're relieved to discover that the blood
on the door was from a pig, rather than the child, but still no one
mentions the possible religious connotations of the act.
Joe and Derek talk to the parents, and
something weird comes up - apparently the dad is so paranoid about
his son having bad influences in his life that he runs background
checks on the parents of his friends! Yet he doesn't have decent
locks on his doors and windows, or a security system? That's weird,
right?
Joe and Derek also feel that was
super-weird (although they don't mention the lack of security for
such a controlling guy), but before they can get into it, the mother
runs out and asks if her kid will be find if they find him in the
first 24 hours, like they say on television. They have her a
provisional yes, and she seems happy with that, even though it's
already been between 6-12 hours and they have no leads.
Reid makes a good observation - the
kid's running shoes are missing from his closet, and his window is
unlocked! He must have left on his own to meet someone! Weird that
they didn't already know this, though - isn't one of the first things
you do in this kind of abduction case is to have the parents check on
what's missing from the kid's room so they can figure out how the
missing kid might be dressed?
Garcia phones in with an update on the
online gaming - the kid was only allowed to play with school friends,
and none of them are missing, so that might be a dead end.
Meanwhile, in Tennessee, Greg and
Jeanne are interviewing the father of the dead kid from 15 years ago,
because I guess the Memphis FBI office is full of losers? The dad of
the first victim reveals that he was in an asylum for some time after
the death of his child, and the killer called him there to taunt him!
So the killer continued stalking him even after the murder!
Unfortunately, because Mandy and the cops had suspected him of the
murder, he didn't bother telling the cops about that call, robbing
them of an additional data point.
Speaking of mysterious calls, Garcia
discovers that the call the night before came from the father's
phone! What about the one that morning? And the ones for the past
week? No info on those?
Still, that's enough information for
Greg and Derek to confront the father with their suspicions -
apparently they don't think it's a little coincidental that in the
first case evidence was also planted to suggest the father was guilty
- almost as if that was part of the killer's signature!
Still, they try to play this ridiculous
plot point out, by having the mother admit that there was only ever
one of them in the room when the calls arrived. Which isn't true -
the phone was ringing while the husband was still in the room with
her, although he ran out by the time she answered it. Still, he
didn't have time to make the morning call.
Joe and Derek observe that if you call
home from the cell phone, it says 'private number', just like the
call from the killer! There's no call home on the phone, of course,
but Joe thinks he could have erased the call from his logs.
Well, yes, he could have, but the phone company would still have records of it, which Garcia could easily check. It's not like there's not a computerized record of every single phone call that a cell phone makes, after all. You can smash your phone and burn the sim card, there's still a record.
Well, yes, he could have, but the phone company would still have records of it, which Garcia could easily check. It's not like there's not a computerized record of every single phone call that a cell phone makes, after all. You can smash your phone and burn the sim card, there's still a record.
Reid answers the front door, where an
FBI agent delivers the call recordings from the first crime! He also
apologizes for it taking so long, since they had to dig it out of
storage. Couple of things here - first, they got it here from Memphis
in around five hours, assuming that you guys called them for it right
after the case meeting. It's a four hour drive, which means they
definitely flew the tape here, which still would have taken over an
hour. That's four hours to find a tape somewhere in storage, arrange
a flight, get it to the airport, fly it one state over, arrange
transport from the airport, and drive it out to the crime scene.
Why apologize? That's amazing time.
Especially considering it would have been infinitely faster to
digitize the tape and just send it to Garcia. Does the family at the
house even have a tape deck for them to play it on?
Also, couldn't they have sent the tape
back with Greg and Jeanne? They were flying back from Memphis after
seeing the other dad, right? Seems like you could have saved some jet
fuel.
One other thing - the guy refers to
Reid as 'Doctor Reid', which, because he's a local agent, means that
someone had to tell him that Reid must be referred to by that title,
which looks all the more silly with each passing year. Especially
since it started because they wanted people to take him seriously
despite how young he was - it's ten years later, and now the agents
that he insists call him 'doctor' are now his age or younger:
Get a haircut, Reid, and start acting
your age. You're not good enough at your job to be this eccentric.
In any event, when the mother hears the
tape, it's clear that it's the exact same voice, right down to the
weird screaming in the background. So this must be the same killer,
because he (or she) is using the same tape!
Garcia finally traces the call - it was
made from a park half a kilometer east of the house! They head out
there with the father, hoping he can lead them to somewhere
significant to their son, and he mentions an abandoned well they
found!
Back at the house, they coach the
mother to try and start a dialogue with the killer. She's
understandably skeptical, since all the killer does is dial a phone
and play a recording. He may not even be listening to her responses.
The episode decides to screw with us by
having the dogs find something next to a log - is it the kid, or just
his jacket? The father runs over to find out, but then we cut back to
the ringing phone! But then the call is the same one that the first
father got at the asylum, so obviously the kid is dead, because it's
the 'gloating' call. There's a 'trace the call' screen running during
the five seconds he's on the phone, but I'm not sure why. Again, this
phone call is being routed through computers, and you can just ask
the computers where it's coming from.
Also, we get a bit of the dad freaking
out before the commercial.
I hate to be the 'I told you so' guy,
but the ME confirms that the kid was already dead during the night.
Given the known MO of the killer, this shouldn't be a surprise to
them, and while I can understand keeping the parents in the dark to
keep them communicating, the team should have already been operating
under this theory.
Finally Greg and Joe get to the blood
on the door - considering that they're both good Catholics, you'd
think that would have happened a long time ago. They point out that
it's backwards, but maybe that was the point? Maybe the killer
thought he was sparing the kid from a fate worse than death? That
seems like a reach. I don't know how you'd make that determination
based on the bible imagery.
The grieving parents are brought back
to the police station - and the guy from Memphis is ther as well, and
wants to talk to them, since he's been where they are. Did he fly
back on the plane with Greg and Jeanne? Why would they bring him?
They specifically thought he had no useful information.
Time for the profile! The baby voice on
the phone means the killer identifies with the kids, and may be
mercy-killing them! So he's technically skilled, from the phone
spoofing, and probably a white guy, since the kids are white. Nothing
really helpful there, folks.
Maybe Jeanne's having more luck with the recording? They strip out the kid's voice, and focus on the background. It turns out she has, and it's completely ridiculous! Here's the audio breakdown she's made:
Apparently the background screaming is
dozens of audio clips layered together to be a wall of noise that the
boy's voice plays over it. The show is asking us to believe that you
could take the audio file of the call and extract all of the separate
tracks. That's not how audio works, people. Once you've flattened it
down, it's flattened, and can't be unflattened. Mix three primary
colours of paint into a brown mess, and then try to get the green
back out. That's what they're asking us to believe they've managed
here. It's absurd. Yes, you could isolate little bits of noise, but
hearing one of the tracks that was used to make the wall of noise,
completely clean? No way.
Anyhoo, the audio Jeanne picks is of a
woman speaking Portuguese being whipped and asking for more money. So
maybe a sex worker?
Reid and Jeanne go down to threaten a
local pimp until he has some information to offer - he did know a
Brazilian sex worker back in the day, who retired and married a
customer! Wait, is this all happening in St. Louis? Shouldn't the
connection be closer to the first victim in Memphis?
They track down the sex worker, who
remembers being tortured by one customer! A guy with an eastern
european wife! He wanted to whip both of them, and the sex worker
remembers the woman seeming pretty frightened! It's important to
note, at this point, that the mother of the dead boy does have a
thick eastern-european accent. This is probably relevant.
Then, in maybe the stupidest scene yet
in this show, we see the father and mother have a fight in a motel
room - they're understandably stressed, you see - and then she goes
out to get toothpaste! The father then gets a call from the killer,
and runs outside - the mother has been kidnapped!
Where were the police? This is a killer
obsessed with tormenting his victims. Why would you not keep an eye
on the parents? Especially within the first twenty-four hours. You
have every reason to think that he'll call again, but you just let
them go off to a motel, all alone? Man, this should be a lawsuit.
The team tries to figure out why the
mother would have stopped her car and opened her door for someone -
could it have been a cop? Someone she knew? Then they wonder why the
fathers are specifically being targeted for suffering. Is there some
connection between the two men?
Turns out the mother of the first
victim was also Eastern-European! Also the calls to the first family
started right around the anniversary of the mother's death! So,
what's the connection? Derek confuses things with a
hilariously-dubbed line:
Your first guess is that the woman
being whipped was the killer's mother? Wouldn't it be way more likely
that it was either her, her husband, or both of them? Why would the
whipped woman's child have audio tape of her being tortured along
with a sex worker? I'm not saying it's not possible, but why would it
be your first guess, which you're certain is true?
They figure that the killer's mother
was also Eastern European, killed herself, and then he was so
traumatized that he found another family with an eastern-european
mother that killed herself, then killed the child to keep them from
suffering through what he experienced!
What? Not a word of that makes... you
know what, let's just move on.
Then it's over to the Eastern Orthodox
church, where a man with a bald spot is watching a ceremony! I guess
he's the killer?
More horrible looping as Garcia gives
us the killer's backstory! They really had to change this guy's
origin story right before the show went out. I wonder why?
Turns out the killer is the computer
science teacher at school! He was the son's favorite, and all the
kids loved him because he let them play games in class. So, you know,
classic paedophile behaviour. Just to be clear - when they did a
background check on everyone the child interacted with, they didn't
notice that one of the teachers at his school was using a fake ID?
What's wrong with Garcia this week?
Okay, so it seems that the killer was
forced to watch the demeaning sex acts between his father, mother,
and sex workers, so that screwed him up. Then, the mother drove her
and her son into a lake to protect them from his father! Now,
whenever he sees a guy with an eastern-european wife and a single
son, he assumes that the mother and child need to be 'rescued via
murder' so he does that! Seems weird that he's not killing the dads,
but whatever.
Now they just need to find the lake
that he's doubtless going to be driving into with the mother -
luckily he calls the father again for more gloating, allowing them to
get a GPS lock on his phone.
At the killer's house, they find a
video of him as a child in a video his mother made, saying the things
from the call! Did they really feel that this was a part of the show
that needed to be explained? He also had all of the VHS tapes of his
dad's sex sessions, so that's where all the audio came from!
Then it turns out that the killer made
the last call from a phone he tossed out of the woods! He's really
back at his house, where half the team is! Um... you tried to
distract them by running out into the woods, but then you hid... in
your own house, the only other place they were guaranteed to go?
What is wrong with you, killer?
Joe and Reid find the killer's secret
passage and use it to murder him as he sneaks up on Jeanne. You know,
she wouldn't have been in danger if there were a bunch of cops here,
the way there obviously should have been.
So he's dead, and the mother is
rescued!
Happy ending!
Happy ending!
Except for a check-in with the family,
who've been through a lot. The team says that they can call if they
need anything, but don't bother apologizing for being so horrible to
the father.
THE END.
1 - Was profiling in any way helpful in
solving the crime?
Kind of? I mean, the assumption they
made about the connection between the Eastern European mothers and
kid seeing himself in the children was a decent one, but the trip to
get there was just so ludicrous. Finding audio of a Brazilian sex
worker? What?
2 - Could the crime have been solved
just as easily using conventional police methods given the known
facts of the case?
One of the first things cops do is
check into the background of dead kids' teachers and people in the
neighbourhood. I can't imagine the killer's ID would have held up
very long. Also, they probably would have kept an eye on the parents
of the victim for more than five minutes after their son's body was
found.
So, on a scale of 1 (Dirty Harry) to 10
(Tony Hill), How Useful Was Profiling in Solving the Crime?
3!
It's the best showing in a while, and
it was still terrible!
I think the biggest problem with this
episode is how preposterous the triggering incident was. We're asked
to believe that in order for this guy to kill someone, he had to find
a family with a controlling dad and an Eastern-European mother who
killed himself? What is the likelihood he would have ever stumbled
onto that if he wasn't specifically looking for it?
Also, is it just me, or did the team's 'expertise' actually delay catching the killer? Think about it - if the cops hadn't called the FBI and found out about the earlier case, they would have investigated in the normal way - asked the kid's friends and teachers who he spent the most time with. The cops would have heard about how his favorite teacher was the one who spoiled kids by letting them play video games, and immediately thought 'hey, that sounds like something a child molester would do to groom his victims!' One quick background check later and the guy's in prison.
Finding out about the other crime just slowed the whole process down - in this case the most obvious suspect actually was the killer, but the team went and overthought everything, sending themselves and the rest of the authorities on a convoluted journey that ended up in the same place as just asking around the school.
Also, is it just me, or did the team's 'expertise' actually delay catching the killer? Think about it - if the cops hadn't called the FBI and found out about the earlier case, they would have investigated in the normal way - asked the kid's friends and teachers who he spent the most time with. The cops would have heard about how his favorite teacher was the one who spoiled kids by letting them play video games, and immediately thought 'hey, that sounds like something a child molester would do to groom his victims!' One quick background check later and the guy's in prison.
Finding out about the other crime just slowed the whole process down - in this case the most obvious suspect actually was the killer, but the team went and overthought everything, sending themselves and the rest of the authorities on a convoluted journey that ended up in the same place as just asking around the school.
I watched this episode years ago. Enjoying your blog posts.
ReplyDeleteYou must be a hoot at parties. And movie dates.
DeleteOh and Spencer Reid IS a damn doctor.
ReplyDeleteHey love your posts! I do contest one point that you always bring up about Reid. Yes he's kind of a strange character with his gun and his hair but he's likely socially awkward or on the spectrum, so he's supposed to not fit in right. As for the doctor thing, I notice people get very up in arms about referring to others as Dr., especially to those who have non-medical doctorates. People invest a huge amount of time, effort, and money into earning a degree like that, and I think it's only right that they go by their title. I'm sure that Reid gets introduced as Dr. Reid which is why people call him that. Even when he corrects someone, the title is an important part of his identity, and his social awkwardness probably keeps him from realizing that he sounds pretentious. He's simply correcting an error. I do laugh at your jokes about him, I just think that people who earn doctorates deserve to be pretentious and use their $300k title.
ReplyDeleteI am here for OP's saltiness RE: Reid! Bc he's not good at his job, hahaha, in fact most of his practical decisions actively hinder whatever he's trying to achieve.
ReplyDeletee.g. Not being knowledgeable about guns, I had no thoughts on the non-standard gun Reid carried until OP mentioned it. Then, within 3 minutes of googling, I found out that revolvers have been retired by all the major law enforcement agencies (even the US Forest Service doesn't use them!). Why? Bc there have been multiple, literal, actual cases of police officers getting killed in gun battles WHILE RELOADING THEIR 6 SHOT REVOLVERS.
The fact that Reid is supposed to be this walking fount of all knowledge while not being conscientious of the super good reasons why he should not be carrying a revolver is in the category of REASONS REID IS TERRIBLE AT HIS JOB.